Thank you so much of his mail, Mr.. Walls, which makes me understand how the response of Mr. Tutino was totally disproportionate in relation to things written by the subscriber, who-what-you tell me of lies and accusations he had made very few.
however, continue to store the incident under the heading "Answer a stupid stupid question" that the lady should ask to be reimbursed for a show and not 'like and' naive and ridiculous in my opinion. I would like to ask her the money spent to buy the paper because I did not like the article she wrote. At the very least referred me to the newsstand, where there is' a reasonable choice of newspapers than its own.
from your answer I read that she does not "play against the superintendent Tutino," and I regret, 'cause there are sufficient grounds to do so as she has more' stressed in its apprezzabilissimi articles. Rightly, I know the situation of the theater and I am very worried about his future. The reason for my letter a few days ago only to focus more attacks 'directed against the actions of Tutino, as a controversy about the quality' of the shows is likely to fall on deaf ears. Sadly I think there are things more 'important on which to point the finger. I greet you dearly
ps the example of the newspaper was not reported to her, of course ;-) Marco
Croissants
0 comments:
Post a Comment